Joerg Becker, Bjoern Niehaves and Karsten Klose (2005)
A Framework for Epistemological Perspectives on Simulation
Journal of Artificial Societies and Social Simulation
vol. 8, no. 4
<https://www.jasss.org/8/4/1.html>
For information about citing this article, click here
Received: 02-Oct-2005 Accepted: 02-Oct-2005 Published: 31-Oct-2005
Figure 1. A morphologic box for a classification of simulation as a research method |
Figure 2. Simulation Process (Krüger 1975) |
Figure 3. Distinct levels of (research) culture |
Figure 4. Assumptions of distinct research paradigms |
Nevertheless, paradigms are in many cases unconscious and not explicated in every research approach or by everyone conducting research. Furthermore, paradigms themselves also base on certain assumptions.
Figure 5. Epistemological Reference Framework (cf Becker and Niehaves 2005) |
A variant of this thought can be, for example, that the range of truth is reduced. No longer is everyone then required for the consensus on the truth or falseness of a statement, only a group of a certain size. With this understanding, statements about truth are thus always to be understood relative to a group. The reference to rationality could also be dropped. To what extent the group now accepts the statements and what the sources of cognition are (from which the acceptance of the statement arises) remains intentionally open. A concept of the consensus theory of truth, altered to this effect, might be:
This concept of truth implies that nothing exists or proves to be relevant in the context of a test of truth, which would not be apparent to the community/group doing the perceiving. Within the search for consensus and truth, the existence of facts and things which are independent from thought and speech of the subject striving for cognition, are not necessary conditions.
Tarski's vision of truth is based to a large degree on linguistics. Thus, truth (T) is determined in terms of Tarski's semantic concept as follows. It applies to s, L and p:
(T) “s" is a true sentence of the object language L, if it applies: p
s: the statement of the object language, whose validity has to be proven
L: object language, which expresses the statement, whose validity has to be proven
p: translation of the object language based statement “s" into the meta language M
M: meta language, which contains predicates of truth regarding object language based statements
Thus, the differentiation between object language and meta language is significant. The object language and meta language must be different from one another. In fact, a language can contain predicates of truth, their application area, though, has to be limited to other languages. Furthermore, it becomes clear that truth always refers to a language, the object language, and thus can be understood as relative linguistic truth.
APEL, K.-O. (1979). Towards a Transformation of Philosophy. London, Routledge Kegan & Paul.
BAUMANN, P. (2002). Erkenntnistheorie. Stuttgart/Weimar, Metzler.
BECKER, J. and Niehaves, B. (2005). "Epistemological Perspectives on IS Research – Analyzing and Systematizing Epistemological Assumptions." Information Systems Journal (forthcoming).
BERKLEY, G. (1975). Philosophical Works. London.
BONJOUR, L. (1998). In Defense of Pure Reason: A Rationalists Account of A Priori Justification. Cambridge/MA.
BOSSEL, H. (1992). Modellbildung und Simulation. Konzepte, Verfahren und Modelle zum Verhalten dynamischer Systeme. Braunschweig, Wiesbaden, Vieweg.
BUNGE, M. A. (1977). Ontology I: The Furniture of the World. Treatise on Basic Philosophy. Dordrecht, the Netherlands et al.
BURRELL, G. and G. Morgan (1979). Sociological Paradigms and Organizational Analysis. London, UK.
CARNAP, R. (2003). The Logical Structure of the World and Pseudoproblems in Philosophy. Chicago, Open Court Publishing Company.
CARNAP, R., H. Hahn, et al. (1929). Wissenschaftliche Weltauffassung: Der Wiener Kreis. Vienna/New York.
CHEN, W. and R. Hirschheim (2004). "A paradigmatic and methodological examination of information systems research from 1991 to 2001." Information Systems Journal 14(3): 197-235.
CHOMSKY, N. (1965). Aspects of the Theory of Syntax. Cambridge/MA.
DAVIDSON, J. (1984). Inquiries Into Truth and Interpretation. Oxford.
DECKER, S., M. Erdmann, et al. (1999). Ontobroker: Ontology Based Access to Distributed and Semi-Structured Information. Semantic Issues in Multimedia Systems. Proceedings of International Conference on Data Semantics DS-8. R. Meersman. Boston, Kluwer Academic Publisher: 351-369.
DESCARTES, R. (1996). Meditations on First Philosophy : With Selections from the Objections and Replies. Cambridge, Cambridge University Press.
FALCONER, D. J. and D. R. Mackay (1999). Ontological Problems of Pluralist Research Methodologies. 5th Americas Conference on Information Systems AMCIS 1999, Milwaukee/WI, U.S.A.
FITZGERALD, B. and D. Howcroft (1998). Competing Dichotomies in IS Research and Possible Strategies for Resolution. 19th International Conference on Information Systems ICIS 1998, Helsinki, Finland.
GETHMANN, C. F. (1995). Deduktion. Enzyklopädie Philosophie und Wissenschaftstheorie. Band 1. J. Mittelstraß. Stuttgart, Weimar: 434.
GLASERSFELD, E. (1986). Steps in the Construction of "Others" and "Reality": A Study in Self-Regulation. Power, Autonomy, Utopia. R. Trappl. London, New York: 107-116.
GLASERSFELD, E. (1987). The Construction of Knowledge. Seaside/CA.
HAAK, S. (1978). Philosophy of Logics. Cambridge/MA.
HABERMAS, J. (1973). Wahrheitstheorien. Wirklichkeit und Reflexion. Walter Schulz zum 60. Geburtstag. H. Fahrenbach. Pfullingen: 211-265.
HANSON, P. and B. Hunter (1992). Return of the A Priori. Calgary/Alberta, University of Calgary Press.
HIRSCHHEIM, R. and H. K. Klein (1989). "Four Paradigms of Information Systems Development." Communications of the ACM 32: 1199-1216.
HUME, D. (1978). A Treatise of Human Nature. Oxford.
KAMLAH, W. and P. Lorenzen (1973). Logical Propaedeutic. Lanham/MD.
KAMLAH, W. and P. Lorenzen (1996). Logische Propädeutik. Vorschule des vernünftigen Redens. Stuttgart, Weimar.
KANT, I. (1999). Critique of Pure Reason. Cambridge, Cambridge University Press.
KIRKHAM, R. L. (1992). Theories of Truth. A Critical Introduction. Cambridge/MA, Cambridge University Press.
KORN, G. A. and J. V. Wait (1978). Digital continuous-system simulation. Englewood Cliffs, NJ, Prentice-Hall.
KRÜGER, S. (1975). Simulation. Grundlagen, Techniken, Anwendungen. Berlin, New York, Walter de Gruyter.
KUHN, T. (1970). The Structure of Scientific Revolutions. Chicago/IL, U.S.A., Chicago University Press.
LAW, A. M. and W. D. Kelton (1991). Simulation Modeling and Analysis. New York et al., McGraw-Hill.
LEE, A. (1991). "Integrating positivist and interpretivist approaches to organizational research." Organization Science 2: 342-365.
LEIBNIZ, G.-W. (1962). Nouveaux Essais sur l'Entendement Humain. Sämtliche Schriften. G.-W. Leibniz. Berlin: 39-527.
LOCKE, J. (1982). An Essay Concerning Human Understanding. Oxford.
LOOSE, J. (1972). A Historical Introduction to the Philosophy of Science. New York, Oxford University Press.
LORENZEN, P. (1987). Constructive Philosophy. Amherst, MA, USA, The University of Massachusetts Press.
MINGERS, J. (2001). "Combining IS research methods: towards a pluralist methodology." Information Systems Research 12(3): 240-259.
MORGAN, B. J. T. (1984). Elements of Simulation. London, New York, Chapman and Hall.
NIEHAVES, B. (2004). A Framework for Analysing the Epistemological Assumptions of Research Methods. Innovation Through Information Technology. 2004 IRMA International Conference, New Orleans/LA, U.S.A.
OAKSHOT, L. (1997). Business Modelling and Simulation. London et al., Pitman Publishing.
ORTNER, E. (1991). "Ein Referenzmodell für den Einsatz von Dictionary/Repository-Systemen in Unternehmen." Wirtschaftsinformatik 33(5): 420-430.
PEDGEN, C. D., R. E. Shannon, et al. (1995). Introduction to Simulation Using SIMAN. New York, McGraw-Hill Inc.
QUINE, W. V. O. (1961). Two Dogmas of Empiricism. From a Logical Point of View. W. V. O. Quine. Cambridge/MA, Cambridge University Press: 20-46.
ROTT, H. (1995). Schluß, induktiver. Enzyklopädie Philosophie und Wissenschaftstheorie. Band 3. J. Mittelstraß. Stuttgart, Weimar: 710-713.
RUSSELL, B. (1956). The Philosophy of Logical Atomism. Logic and Knowledge. Essays 1901-1950. B. Russell. London: 177-281.
SCHEIN, E. H. (1992). Organizational Culture and Leadership. A Dynamic View. San Francisco/CA, U.S.A., Jossey-Bass Publishers.
SCHMITT, F. F. (1994). Socializing Epistemology. The Social Dimension of Knowledge. Lanham/MD.
SCHMITT, F. F. (1995). Truth. A Primer. Boulder/CO, Westview Press.
SCHRIBER, T. J. (1987). "The Nature and Role of Simulation inthe Design of Manufacturing Systems." Simulation in CIM and Artificial Intelligence Techniques(25): 5-18.
SEIFFERT, H. (1996). Einführung in die Wissenschaftstheorie 1. München.
SHANKS, G., E. Tansley, et al. (2003). Using Ontology to validate Conceptual Models. Communications of the ACM, Association for Computing Machinery. 46: 85-89.
SPINOZA, B. (1992). The Ethics ; Treatise on the Emendation of the Intellect ; Selected Letters. Indianapolis/IN, Hackett Publishing Company.
STENIUS, E. (1960). Wittgenstein's Tractatus: A Critical Exposition of its Main Lines of Thought. Oxford.
TARSKI, A. (1944). "The Semantic Concept of Truth and the foundation of semantics." Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 4(1): 341-375.
TARSKI, A. (1956). The Concept of Truth in Formalized Languages. Logic, Semantics, Mathematics. Papers from 1923 to 1938. A. Tarski. Oxford: 152-278.
TARSKI, A. (1993). Truth and Proof. A Philosophical Companion to First-Order-Logic. R. I. G. Hughes. Indianapolis/IN: 101-125.
VON Foerster, H. (1996). Wissen und Gewissen. Versuch einer Brücke. Frankfurt a. M.
WEBER, R. (2003). Conceptual Modelling and Ontology: Possibilities and Pitfalls. Journal of Database Management. 14: 1-20.
WEBER, R. (2004). "The Rhetoric of Positivism Versus Interpretivism." MIS Quarterly 28(1): iii-xii.
WEDEKIND, H. (1979). "Die Objekttypen-Methode beim Datenbankentwurf - dargestellt am Beispiel von Buchungs- und Abrechnungssystemen." Zeitschrift für Betriebswirtschaft 49(5): 367-387.
WITTGENSTEIN, L. (2001). Tractatus Logico Philosophicus. London, Routledge.
WYSSUSEK, B. and M. Schwartz (2003). Towards a Sociopragmatic-Constructivist Understanding of Information Systems. Computing Information Technology: The Human Side. S. R. Gordon. Hershey et al., Idea Group Publishing: 267-297.
Return to Contents of this issue
© Copyright Journal of Artificial Societies and Social Simulation, [2005]